![]() ![]() enable iproute mpls-next-hop vr vr-acme.VRF, is still not reached (we don’t see anything in the specific VRF routing table, as expected. We enabled «mpls protocol ldp» and «mpls» itselfĪt this point, LDP starts to work, and we start to see some MPLS stuff, but the main goal, that is to see routing information on the two separate We added the 2 loopback vlans and the ospf PTP vlan in the mpls and LDP «process». ![]() I tried the default value, before iBGP or after iBGP, and the result is pretty close the same:Īs soon as we enable the MPLS routing stuff, things start to work NOT in the way we expected/wanted. I still have doubts on «where» to put the priority of the MPLS. We changed the iBGP route priority in the extreme devices, to be similar to the Cisco administrative distance vr-mgt_ool_104999 with RD 172:104999 and route-target 172:104999 in both RX ad TX, with a binded loopback interface 4.4.4.x/32įrom my point of view, the main «suspect» is something in the routing part. vr-acme with RD 172:10 ad route-target 172:10 in both RX and TX, with a binded loopback interface 3.3.3.x/32 We created 2 VPN-VRF on every switch/router: LDP protocol seems to work well between the two vendors. RFI1 is the RR for the BGP part, and the ONLY neighbor for each switch/router.īGP and OSPF seems to work fine as soon as we DON’T enable MPLS. The «x» refers to the numeric ID of each switch/router, with the only exception of RFI1, where:Īll switches are in the same OSPF area 172.18.128.217, and is the BGP AS 172. On each switch/router we have 2 loopback interfaces/vlans: ![]() Here are the L1 and L2/元 schemes of version 1 of my lab. I'll try to explain what I've done with some pictures and text information. I'm trying to get 元VPN mpls working between Extreme Networks x460g2 and various cisco devices (3600, ASR920, 7600, 9000), and actually I'm stuck. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |